August 24, 2020 | Court Rulings, Valuations
Wright v. Old Gringo, Inc. In this discovery dispute, the defendants sought to exclude the plaintiff expert’s valuation report, arguing it was untimely and the late disclosure would hurt the defendants. In rejecting the defense motion, the court noted any delay was largely caused by the defendants’ discovery tactics to thwart production of vital financial Continue Reading »
August 10, 2020 | Court Rulings
McLelland v. Paxton In a “complicated” (court’s word) dissolution case, the Washington Court of Appeals recently made an important ruling on whether a professional limited liability company (PLLC) can have goodwill separate from the goodwill of the professionals. Focus on location In 2005, the plaintiff, through his professional service corporation, acquired an ownership interest in Continue Reading »
July 27, 2020 | Court Rulings, Valuations
In re Panera Bread Company In a statutory appraisal case that involved the sale of a publicly traded company to a privately held entity, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently decided the deal price was a reliable indicator of fair value and a downward adjustment for synergies was justified but not practicable. But, because the Continue Reading »
July 13, 2020 | Court Rulings
Bayou Place Limited Partnership v. Alleppo’s Grill, Inc. The doctrine of force majeure (aka “act of God” doctrine) has received a lot of attention during the current COVID-19 crisis, which has harmed great swaths of the national and global economy owing to mandatory closures of businesses, breaks in the supply chain, and the diminution of Continue Reading »
June 29, 2020 | Court Rulings, Valuations
Linde v. Linde In a bitter fight between siblings over the buyout of the minority shareholder’s interest in a successful construction business, the trial court found the asset-based valuation the majority shareholder’s expert proposed was fatally flawed for at least two reasons. The dispute involved Linde Corp. (LindeCo), one of several construction companies the Linde Continue Reading »
June 15, 2020 | Court Rulings, Valuations
Coster v. UIP Companies In a breach of fiduciary duty action arising out of a controversial stock sale, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed the plaintiff’s attacks on the underlying valuation, noting the appraiser was “exceptionally knowledgeable about the industry” and held “informed beliefs” as to the company’s specific structure. His methodology generated a reliable Continue Reading »
June 1, 2020 | Court Rulings, Valuations
R.D. Clark & Sons, Inc. v. Clark In a buyout dispute involving a Connecticut family business, an appellate court recently upheld the trial court’s decision not to tax affect the earnings of the company in valuing the departing shareholder’s interest, even though experts for both sides tax affected. However, this particular ruling is unlikely to Continue Reading »
May 18, 2020 | Court Rulings, Valuations
Helen Ziegler Benjamin v. Island Management In a family dispute involving an irrevocable trust and several related closely held companies, the plaintiff trustees alleged a management company managed by certain family members was involved in misconduct. A discovery dispute ensued over the plaintiffs’ demand to inspect certain records and books of the defendant company. The Continue Reading »
May 4, 2020 | Court Rulings, Valuations
Puklich v. Puklich A buyout dispute between siblings who owned several businesses generated a noteworthy decision from the North Dakota Supreme Court on the use of valuation discounts. Reviewing the applicable case law, the high court found the trial court, in determining the fair value of one sibling’s minority share in a closely held corporation, Continue Reading »
April 20, 2020 | Court Rulings, Divorce Litigation
Lucchesi v. Lucchesi In divorce cases, appreciation of separate property is one of the most complex issues whose analysis can be challenging for attorneys and valuators. A recent Tennessee appeals court decision is noteworthy for explaining the framework courts in this jurisdiction use to decide whether the non-owner spouse has a claim to the increase Continue Reading »